Saturday 30 June 2012

EPILOGUE: ONE LAST CHANCE TO SAVE STRYVELAND - AN INJUNCTION?


Letter Received:

There is such overwhelming local and other opposition to the Betws and Mynydd y Gwair proposals that a class action can be organized to share costs, legal aid and after the event insurance taken out. As you may know the Open Spaces Society is the oldest such society in Britain as offered to assist inc financially. 

Briefly in my opinion and in that of many others 

1) The development is illegal and may be demolished under Section 41 of the 2006 Commonland Act by County Court or High Court Order following an injunction.

2) Commonland was illegally enclosed under an obsolete act of 1852 or so, and the development is taking place on peat, again illegal.

3) A 90% local objecting majority (written objections) was ignored by a single planning officer called Wild. Other objections were all ignored, including one by CADW of the Welsh Government. In my view, as on my blog, this is illegal because it violates human rights which I have listed on my blog, notably the right to opinion, assembly and freedom of speech. Together, these rights constitute the right to democracy. Ignoring democracy is illegal and obviosuly very dangerous. It violates the European Convention on Human Rights, whch is law in England and Wales.

4) It violates the precedent set in the Helmsby High Court ruling, in that a 90% objecting majority was over-ruled.

5) It violates environmental laws, such as local council by laws and other laws protecting the environment.

6) It violates laws protecting wild life and ancient monuments. Part of a newly discovered ancient monument, ten thousand years old, has already been damaged or endangered before there has been time to study it.

7) It is malfeasance, because wind turbines are useless industrially, and a mass of data shows that there is no global warming due to carbon dioxide. Wind turbines are not needed, and they are a danger to the grid. They threaten to bankrupt the economy. No responsible government would do this to its own People. 
   
The injunction application would seek an order to have the turbines demolished, and similarly all turbine farms demolished which were built by ignoring local opposition majorities. Turbine developments planned against known local objecting majorities would be stopped by the injunction, notably Mynydd y Gwair, against which there is overhwelming local oppostion, expressed many times in many ways. This would occur all over England and Wales. Compensation would be sought for environmental damage, and compensation for those whose human rights were violated. Finally the injunction would order wind turbine companies to demolish illegal developments at their own expense, and to pay back their subsidies to the government. Similarly all those paid subsidies illegally would have to pay them back to the government by court order.  

Cordially

Myron Evans

Prof. M. W. Evans, Armiger of Mawr, Civil List Pensioner, D. Sc.

Comment Re Above, I have recieved nuch interestin Information from Prof. M.W. Evans of which I shall publish more of over coming week. So do return to this blog to be kep up to date, the Struggle To Save Stryveland might not be over yet?

                                        Also see up dates in link below: