Wednesday 11 July 2012

PWYSIG SEE: TURBINE TRANSPORT TEST RUN - AS FILM SHOWS IT IS A FAKE UP - WHY? See This Post - NOW PATRIOTS AND PARTISANS AND ALL WHO OPPOSE THE 'WINDMILLING OF WALES' CAN WE ALL GET AN ACT TOGETHER AND MAKE UP FOR THE 'STRYVELAND STUPIDITY' BY THOSE WHO FOOLISHLY FAILED TO 'SEIZE THE TIME' - NEXT TIME BE AROUND TO PROTEST LOUDLY FROM SWANSEA DOCKS TO PONTARDAWE TO MYB/WMP ENTRANCE - AGAIN WE CALL FOR A NATIONAL MASS MOBALISATION - NOT TO TURN UP IS YOUR FAILURE AGAIN AND FAIL AGAIN AND I SUGGEST TO 'nashies' and 'nimbies' IT IS 'GAME OVER' - GIVE UP AND FIND AN HARMLESS HOBBY?



Film on Turbine Test run in Pontardawe


Councillors at Meeting questioned length plus fact no turbine used, so height was not considered other than company guessing more trees have to be chopped down. Also not considered was weight and damage to road, you will also note the Test Run was not all the way from  Swansea Docks, now go check out the route and the other Roundabouts a number that are on the main drag to Morriston Hospital and those that have access to Motor Ways West and East as well as into Swansea, Neath and of course north to Head of the Vallies. Then take aboard fact that besides the Turbine Lorry a number of ancillery back up vechiles plus Police Cars and bikes will be in the Turbine Convoy. In time too Concrete Lorries need to also eventually travel to site, this is all a recipe for potential disaster and I have not yet pointed out that people have to go to and fro home to Work, School and College, Appointents and Shopping also maybe to Hospital Accidernt and Emergency. Other than this how much is this costing the local rate and tax payers?

Now we need loads of letters to all the press National and local and pobl Ardal Pontardawe alerted as to the potential hell coming their way on a Turbine Transporter. So do something now, not least begin to prepare for some real, I mean real RADICAL PROTEST ACTION - Loud , Colourful and CREATIVE!!!

For those not into Prtotest Action of the Radical Kind there is a way you can give passive support to the below, please do so:

STATEMENT OF CLAIM GROUNDS FOR APPLICATION FOR AN INJUNCTION TO DEMOLISH THE MYNYDD BETWS DEVELOPMENT.

The following is drafted for a solicitor who may instruct a barrister. The applicants seek an injunction to order the demolition of the Mynydd Betws development under Section 41 of the 2006 Commonland Act, adopted 1/4/2012 by the Welsh Government. Section 41 asserts that any illegal development on registered commonland must be demolished at developer expense. The injunction application also seeks to restore the land, seeks compensation for human rights violations, and seeks to have all pylons and access roads and so forth to be demolished at developer expense. The applicants assert that the development is illegal for the following reasons. 

1) Violation of lawful human rights under the European Convention on Human Rights, which is law in England and Wales. The fundamental principle of human rights is expressed in the United Nations Charter of 1948. “The will of the People will be the basis for the authority of government.” Under article 25 of the International Covenant on Human Rights (1966) the People shall have the opportunity to take part in the conduct of public affairs. These fundamental rights were violated in that the Betws planning application in that many local objecting groups and individuals were ignored, including a 90% majority of written objections. National protection policies were violated, notably those protecting the environment, wild life and ancient monuments. These objecting groups included CADW of the Welsh Government itself. In particular, points 35, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44 and 45 of the report by Mr Wild, the planning inspector show clearly how local concerns were ignored illegally. The recent Hemsley High Court ruling asserts that local concerns are paramount, and over-ride national policy. This ruling sets a precedent for demolition of all turbine sites which are or were opposed by a local majority. 

2) Violation of article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone shall have the right to freedom of opinion and expression, the right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference .....” . Point one above shows that local freedom of expression was over-ruled by one planning inspector, Mr Wild, and that is interference in the lawful human right of opinion. 3) Violation of the European Instrument for Democracy, and the European Convention on Human Rights, in that local opinion was over-ruled, a violation of the lawful right of democracy. The Hemsley High Court ruling sets a precedent in that local democracy is paramount. 4) Violation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, essentially the lawful right to freedom of speech, opinion, expression and participation, collectively the lawful right to democracy. 

5) Violation of resolution 57 (1999) of the United Nations, which asserts that democracy must mean the full recognition of all human rights. A very large local objecting majority cannot be over-ruled lawfully by one planning official. 6) Violation of Section 38 of the Commonland Act 2006, which prohibits all works on registered commonland unless ministerial consent is obtained. Ministerial consent cannot be given legally against a large objecting local majority, see points (1) to (5) above. 7) Violation of the recent Hemsley High Court ruling, which states that concerns about the landscape are more important than national needs. 

8) Violation of environmental laws which prohibit development on peat, and in genral on landscape of outstanding natural beauty. The whole of Mynydd Betws and Mynydd y Gwair consists of peat to greater or lesser extent and are rare and most beautiful ecologies. To destroy these is a major crime against humanity. 

9) Violation of EEC laws on habitat protection. Both Mynydd y Gwair and Betws are 100% habitat protected. 10) Violation of local Council by laws on the environment. 11) Illegal enclosure of land under an obsolete act of 1852. 

12) Conflict of interest, in that political parties are influenced by wind turbine executives. I request other parties in the proposed class action to list other law violations here. Myron Evans Prof. M. W. Evans, Armiger of Mawr, Civil List Scientist, D. Sc. (Wales), H. M. Civil Listwww.aias.us.

Contact Sian Ifan at s.ifan@ntlworld.com for further information also with offers of help or other support, noting in time financial help may be needed.

As for organising protests no need to contact anyone other than your own Societies and Groups, community or otherwise or just yourselves go into Protest action. all you need to know in this direction can be found in this blog and in Stryveland Cymru and not PAW - Patriots Against Windmills, they are not for real but just another 'Facebook Fusilier Fantasy'. IGNORE and instead become if you wish a 'STRYVELANDER', no joining just 'Autonomous Action'. simple!!!

Please Publicize the Above by every means far and wide asap.

Diolch!

Gethin Gruffydd.